IgorShare Thoughts and Ideas

Consulting and Training

Archive for the ‘Alt.Net’ Category

AppFabric Service Bus Queues and Topics presentation (for Boston Azure User Group)

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 12/20/2011

Recently we’ve delivered a presentation to the Boston Azure User Group on how perfectly the cloud technologies are aligned for development for the Mobile Apps and clients. My coworkers from Blue Metal Architects delivered great content about integrating iOS (featured iPhone and iPad) and Windows Phone with the cloud. I’ve covered the use of the AppFabric Service Bus Queues and Topics – these technologies are perfect for communications for partially connected clients (like mobile ones).

Posted in Architect, Azure, Community, Continuous Education, Messaging, Presentations, Service Bus, Training | Leave a Comment »

Architect Factory – Agile Design: Best Practices

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 06/15/2011

Thanks for everyone attending the Architect Factory last week, especially everyone that attended my presentation. Great participation and great questions – Thanks.

As promised – below are the slides from the talk:

P.S. I’m still trying to figure out what happened to the video recording of the session. Will update the post as soon as the issue will get resolved.

Posted in Agile, Alt.Net, Peer Code Review, Presentations, Refactoring, Training | Leave a Comment »

Agile Design: Best Practices – we KNOW it’s possible

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 05/12/2011

Finally got around to clean up the slide deck and improve the presentation flow. Please enjoy the “Best Practices for the Agile Design”.

Posted in Agile, Composite Applications, Continous Integration, Organization, Presentations, Thoughts, Tutorials | Leave a Comment »

Caliburn.micro – Jump start composite applications for WPF, Silverlight and WP7

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 05/09/2011

This weekend we had Boston CodeCamp. Even though the main site for Boston CodeCamps (TheDevCommunity.org) is under construction and major overhaul – the event organization was as smooth as ever. Thanks for all the organizers and attendees.

The two sessions that I ran had a good attendance and a good flow of questions – thanks for everyone who joined!

As promised, I’m going to publish the slides and the source code.

Demo application source code – on my SkyDrive.

Posted in Agile, Caliburn, Composite Applications, MVVM, Presentations, Tutorials | Leave a Comment »

ProductCamp Boston: Building lean products with distributed agile teams

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 04/12/2011

A week ago (Sat 4/2/2011) gave a presentation about tips, tricks and best practices that can greatly help you to build products with the distributed teams.

Product Camp Boston 4/2/11

Thanks for the organizers of the ProductCamp (http://productcampboston.org/) and all the attendees for making a great event.

Posted in Agile, ALM, Community, Composite Applications, Continous Integration, Design, Kanban, Organization, Presentations, Thoughts, Tutorials | Leave a Comment »

Tip: Showing a Main view as a tray app with Caliburn.Micro

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 03/31/2011

The trick here is to make sure that the main view doesn’t pop-up right away in a visible form. After creation and resolving all the binding rules – the main view should be in a Hidden form.

This can easily be achieved with customizing the WindowManager by sub-classing it and adding one extra method:

public class CustomWindowManager : WindowManager
    public Window MainWindow(object rootModel, object context = null)
        return CreateWindow(rootModel, false, context);

As soon as you’ll have the new WindowManager – the logic for the root view creation in the Boostrapper should be adjusted accordingly:

protected override void DisplayRootView()
    var viewModel = IoC.Get<IShell>();

    var windowManager = IoC.Get<CustomWindowManager>();

    _mainWindow = windowManager.MainWindow(viewModel);

Here is a simple ShellView that uses a WPF TrayIcon implementation from CodeProject:

<UserControl ...
            MenuActivation="LeftOrRightClick" PopupActivation="DoubleClick">
            <!-- Set a simple context menu  -->
                    <MenuItem Header="Exit" cal:Message.Attach="AppExit" />

The View Model for this view is very straight forward:

public class ShellTrayViewModel : Screen, IShell
    public void AppExit()

That’s it.

Posted in .NET, C#, Caliburn, MVVM, WPF | 5 Comments »

Tip: opening a MessageBox in Caliburn

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 03/27/2011

While working with Caliburn V2 I’ve noticed that there is no default View for the message box. It was a bumpy road figuring out how to add one but I’ve learned a lot.

In this post you can see my solution for this challenge, but the flexibility of the framework allows multiple solutions and you may come up with a different one.

The result of this exercise look like this:


In my case I wanted to warn the user during the Screen closure if the changes have not been saved. The usual place to hook the check is in “CanClose” method:

public override void CanClose(Action<bool> callback)
    if (HasChanges)
        var result = Show.MessageBox("Current item was not saved. Do you really want to close it?",
            "Question", new[] { Answer.Ok, Answer.Cancel });

        result.Completed += (s, e) => callback(result.Answer == Answer.Ok);


public static class Extensions
    public static void ExecuteWithDefaultServiceLocator(this IResult result)
        result.Execute(new ResultExecutionContext(IoC.Get<IServiceLocator>(), null, null));

Notice that the result of the “Completed” callback from the MessageBox is used to raise the callback reply for the “CanClose” method.

When I ran the application I’ve received an error from Caliburn that the “QuestionDialogView” was not found. After checking the source I’ve noticed that the View, in fact, is not there. I had to create one. This is my simplified take on the view:

<UserControl ...>
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot">
    	<RowDefinition Height="40"/>
    <ContentControl x:Name="FirstQuestion" Grid.Row="0">
                <TextBlock x:Name="Text" Text="{Binding Text}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Style="{StaticResource DefaultTextBlockStyle}" />
    <ItemsControl x:Name="Buttons" Grid.Row="1" HorizontalAlignment="Right" Margin="0,10,0,0">
                <StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
                    <Button Content="{Binding Content, Converter={StaticResource upperCase}}" cal:Message.Attach="{Binding Action}" Width="70" />
				<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" />

After the view was defined – it had to be registered in the IOC to be found. This is how I did it in the bootstrapper:

                .Using(x => x.ViewLocator<DefaultViewLocator>())
                    .Configured(x => x.AddNamespaceAlias("Caliburn.ShellFramework", "MyProject.Common.Views"))

BTW: in the following article you can find a full View definition for the MessageBox. When I’ve replaced my XAML with the XAML from this article – I’ve received exactly the same result:


Posted in .NET, Caliburn, IOC/DI, MEF, MVVM, Tutorials | Leave a Comment »

Office Applications via Prism of Unity

Posted by Igor Moochnick on 03/19/2011

This article was submitted to the MSDN magazine for publication 2 years ago. It wasn’t published due to budget cuts in the magazine and my small disagreement with Glen Block on the way I’ve used the bootstrappers. Glen was busy this time with MEF and we didn’t have time to resolve our differences.

So, for what it worth, it’s a great article and helped me and my teams in a lot of ways.

Now you’ll be the judge of that if you’ll keep on reading.

This article discusses:

  • VSTO – Visual Studio Tools for Office system
  • Prism v2 – December 19 drop 8 – Composite Application Guidance for WPF and Silverlight
  • Unity Application Block 1.2 – October 2008 drop
  • WPF
  • Visual Studio 2008 Sp1
  • Introduction

    Adding integration with Office suite was always a sweet fruit that only the daring people were willing to touch. This is mostly due to a different development model that the Office suite demands – you have to specifically target your functionality to work with Office applications and develop it separately from your main application. Office integration is based on COM knowledge. At the beginning, it was hard to wrap your head around the Office COM object model, but, with the release of the VSTO (Microsoft Visual Studio Tools for Office System), it became much easier to develop the integration for the .NET applications. The use of VSTO PIA (Primary Interpol Assemblies) makes it easier but does not change the paradigm very much: it is still necessary to develop separate application components that integrate into the Office suite. Until today, it has been hard to reuse and integrate parts of a primary product with the Office suite. We need a way to create GUI applications that can be easily decomposed into separate parts and components, and re-hosted in different ways and configurations. In other words: we need a way to create composite GUI blocks that can be hosted by Office applications and Windows applications equally.

    Note that the biggest benefits of creating composite applications in general, and for Office suite in particular, are maintainability and testability. Your components can be developed separately from each other by distributed teams and tested outside of the Office applications while maintaining high quality levels of the code. This greatly reduces the complexity of the development process.

    The Office Suite applications are, by nature, composite ones. They consist of a lot of different parts and services that have to intercommunicate and coexist in a common environment. Let us take Outlook as an outstanding example. It consists from many different parts, like folder trees, explorers (folder views), inspectors (item views), ribbons, form regions, configuration tabs, etc. All of those components have to be loaded, initialized and composed in a certain way. And do not forget that, after they are loaded, they have to communicate with each other and change their views and representations in reaction to the changes in the state of their peers.

    Let us see a simplified workflow of what happens when we change an active folder in Outlook to another one:

  • A new folder is selected in a folder tree
  • Toolbar is updated to enable or disable actions that are allowed in the selected folder
  • An active Explorer clears its current items list and populates it with the list of items from the new selected folder
  • A first item in the list is automatically selected, which causes the explorer to:
  • Update the toolbar to reflect actions that can be applied to the selected item
  • Locate an appropriate inspector that knows how to render the selected item and render it in an adjoined pane (to the explorer)
  • Locate the appropriate form regions that are associated with the selected item, create appropriate custom task panes and render them
  • Note how complex the described workflow is, and adding your own functionality into it brings certain challenges.

    Outlook is not alone in this case – all the other applications from the Microsoft Office Suite, in their own different contexts, have similarly complex workflows. All of them have menu bars, ribbons tool bars, panes, regions, etc. This leads us to the question: is there a way to solve these different complexities in a common way? The answer is Yes!

    Recently released Prism (i.e. the Composite Application Guidelines for WPF) is a perfect candidate to untangle such a tight logic knot and help us create simple composite applications that can play nicely with the applications from the Office suite. It describes how we can create composite applications from modular blocks and assemble then however we need. Furthermore, this broadens the horizons of the hosting solutions. This article will take you step by step through the implementation of an application that can be executed equally as a standalone or as a hosted one. We will see how it can be hosted within an Office application as well.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Posted in Composite Applications, Office API, Prism, Tutorials, Unity, VSTO, WPF | 2 Comments »

    Messaging Platform and Service Bus Resources

    Posted by Igor Moochnick on 10/25/2009

    On the recent project we’ve put in place a messaging platform. Apparently my engineers had a vague understanding what that is. To save you the same trouble I’ve gathered a bunch of interesting resources that can help you get up to date:

    Open source Service Bus implementations



    WCF (misc)

    Posted in Messaging, REST, Service Bus, WCF | Leave a Comment »

    More information on MEF

    Posted by Igor Moochnick on 01/02/2009

    If you’re interested in Composite Applications in general and in MEF in particular – you may find Glen Block’s blog interesting.

    Posted in Composite Applications, MEF | Leave a Comment »

    %d bloggers like this: